Microsoft Dynamics Brazil: Implementation, Help, Techniques Design
Microsoft Dynamics GP powerful points. Microsoft, being chief in Running Methods, Company Products and services, and also having such platforms as Microsoft Trade, Microsoft SQL Host - is now able to capitalize on ERP technology infrastructure, which includes ERP integration: SQL heterogeneous queries, Sharepoint workflows, web portals. Cloud GP At the same time frame, long time existence on the market for such products as Microsoft View provides Microsoft the option to rely on View individual experience - Microsoft Dynamics products won't require individual training (from the screen intuitiveness standpoint) - Microsoft Dynamics CRM has View Customer, Microsoft Dynamics GP may have tighter integration with View in its version 9.0. Creating some remarks on yet another Microsoft solution - Microsoft Little Organization Accounting - it's incorporated with MS View, where you can create invoices and promote prospect contacts to your MS SBA customers.
SAP Organization One. This device was bought by SAP from Israel application growth business four decades ago. The driven purpose was possibly the need to move down to mid-size and even little clientele, plus SAP needed such solution to be easily convenient to Multilanguage and complicated international taxation rules. SAP Organization You've got CRM, ERP/Production modules and technically can offer as ERP/MRP/CRM for production or maintenance subsidiary of large corporation. SAP Organization You've got modern architecture and style and it's this that is actually a powerful level in choice creating to pick ERP platform. SAP Organization You've got integration to Microsoft Company - it could use email message through MS View client / SMTP and in include with MS Company on the amount of COM things
Microsoft Dynamics arguments. During the time when Microsoft Dynamics / Project Green will work allow Microsoft ERP products to work with Microsoft Company technologies SAP is many years behind in that direction. SAP is currently getting Microsoft allow SAP mySAP integration with Microsoft Office. Microsoft has that powerful discussion against SAP Organization One - SAP deploys business Experts who are very strong generally ERP/MRP plus possibly Organization and Industry Vertical Visiting to apply ERP from midsize business, wherever technology consulting and experience come first. The result is lengthier implementation cycle plus complexity with SAP Organization One integration with technology modern and legacy products
SAP Organization One Arguments. Microsoft is wanting to trap one to its specialized solutions and private technologies. It will do if we give you excellent ERP platform which has great integration tools to Microsoft Company plus permits some integration with Windows platform itself - you need to use VB.Net or C#.Net (our commentary - you can have your SAP Organization Someone to keep in touch with outside world with such non-Microsoft platforms as IBM Lotus Notes Domino and use Lotus Notes as Document workflow)
Additional Microsoft Arguments. There are analytics on the market on the ERP proper study market who support Microsoft in the opinion that SAP Organization One will need technology developments (such as creating its own Company platform or tighter cooperation with Microsoft Company products) to stay recent with the ERP market in the entire year of 2010...
Additional Considerations. Of course SAP has extra alarms and whistles, such as language move - you are able to move from German, German or Brazilian Portuguese to US English by demanding Cnrtl critical combination. Microsoft Skill was designed in earlier 1990th and doesn't support this type of good functionality and Unicode - the question often asked by the outlook from China, India and Arabic World.